type all threads links
  rss feed

Climate Change Bill and consultation document published today, 13 March 07

Thread started on 13/3/2007 13:16

Jessica

Jessica

http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/latest/2007/climate-0313.htm

Well, it’s Red Letter Day. Here is the link to Milliband’s statement to the House and the actual Bill and consultation document – note this is 179 pages! The Bill itself is 34 pages with 20 pages of explanatory notes. The Bill is going to full public consultation and full debate in Parliament, so everyone needs to get started on lobbying on what amendments they want to see!

let's get reading!

andy_ross

andy_ross

60% by 2050 may be hopelessly inadequate but I feel this bill represents a huge step forward. Congrats to Friends of the Earth et al who campaigned it into existence. I have just printed off the 179 pages (sorry, trees!). The more of us that get to grips with this document the better. I intend to throw my tuppence-worth into the consultation. I would also be very happy to collaborate with any other interested CRAGgers. At the very least we could put in a dossier of CRAGgers’ contributions.

Andy

 

On targets and suchlike

zerocarbonsteve

Thanks! I would like to lobby for a larger and more rapid cut than has been currently proposed.
George Mombiot has suggested 90% in UK emissions by 2030.

While this would require a ‘war effort’ it is commensurate with the risks.
7 billion tonnes of CO2 per year would be ‘safe’*: that makes 1 tonne of CO2 per year per person.
Current rate of pollution is 25 billion tonnes of CO2 per year from fossil fuels (42 billion tonnes CO2 equivalent per year total – including deforestation and the other greenhouse gases).

Actions speak louder than words. My gut feeling is that the UK is seem as taking this issue seriously then the rest of the world will.
60% by 2050 (4 tonnes of CO2 per person) is a recipie to stabilise global emissions at current levels (also ~4tonnes per person per year):
NOT to stabilise global concentrations of greenhouse gases.
To stabilise concentrations we need to get down to 1 tonne per person, difficult but nobody said that saving the planet was easy.
How to do it: http://www.zerocarbonnow.org/UK_Calculator.xls
S

NOTES
Colin Forrest’s paper (origin of Mombiot’s 90% by 2030) is here:
http://portal.campaigncc.org/files/THE_CUTTING_EDGE_CLIMATE_SCIENCE_TO_A…
There’s a few typos that come from non-peer-reviewed stuff (stabilisation at 450ppm concentration, not emissions) , but the basic argument is sound.
Basically the oceans sequestre 2GtC / 7 Billion Tonnes of CO2 each year – that’s 1 tonne CO2 per person per year.
The forests also sequester some as well, but that will go into reverse mid-century.
The Amazon starts to dry out (and maybe burn) as early as 2030 – hence immediate action required.
2030 is also a good timeframe for planning investment.

 

And for individual emissions

robinsmith3

robinsmith3

And for individual emissions for CRAG that amounts to about half that or a 0.5 tonnes CO2 footprint in 2030

Latest calc I made was exactly 540kg CO2.

Needs a hell of a lot of low carbon tech, goods and svcs then! I wonder what those things will look like

 

and/or...

andy_ross

andy_ross

a lot less rushing about and a lot more local fun, food and fings.

 

(: Would seem to make sense

robinsmith3

robinsmith3

(: Would seem to make sense …today. Who knows what sort of energy will be driving the economy in 30 years. I just hope we’ve recovered from the plague of status anxiety by then… a glut of carbon rations

 

two weeks to get your responses in - 12th June the deadline

andy_ross

andy_ross

Anyone wanting to throw their tuppenceworth into the Climate Change Bill consultation has until 12th June. For a little essential background and some killing irony read the fantastic Tyndall Centre’s draft response here:

http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/briefing_notes/bn17.pdf

whose summary reads as follows:

􀂃 The Government is to be congratulated for introducing its Draft Climate Change Bill
􀂃 The atmospheric concentrations implied by the logic of the Bill are upwards of 600ppmvCO2, and could well be in excess of 750ppmvCO2
􀂃 The targets are more likely to contribute to a world 4°C or 5°C warmer than preindustrial, than they are to constrain warming to no more than 2°C
􀂃 The carbon reduction targets within the Draft Bill should be re-visited, be evidence based and be in keeping with the latest IPCC science on the subject
􀂃 All Government reference to targets, temperatures and concentrations should be informed by a clear understanding of the science and of the ‘correlation trail’ between temperature and emission pathways
􀂃 The Bill should provide joined-up climate change legislation in which emissions from all sectors are factored into the emission pathway. However, even with the Bill’s current neglect of aviation and shipping, the emission pathway it describes correlates approximately with an 80% and 60% chance of exceeding 2°C and 3°C warming respectively

If you are feeling lazy, pick from one of these!

http://www.wdm.org.uk/campaigns/climate/action/consultation.php
http://www.foe.co.uk/campaigns/climate/press_for_change/climate_bill/ind…
http://peopleandplanet.org/climatebill/2007_bill_briefing#email
http://www.woodland-trust.org.uk/campaigns/climatebill/

These demand: – 80% or greater cuts by 2050 – a commitment to doing our bit to achieve 2 degrees limit on global warming – inclusion of aviation and shipping – annual or at most three yearly budget periods

http://climatechangenews.org/campaign/climate-change-consultation.html

This also criticises the lack of science behind the proposed target and argues for adoption of Contraction and Convergence.

Or do it properly by downloading the full form! Click on this:

http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/climatechange-bill/response-fo…

Happy ranting!

 

CRAGgers responses

andy_ross

andy_ross

Leeds CRAG’s brilliant responses to the draft bill:

http://www.carbonrationing.org.uk/leeds/files/climate-bill-consultation-...

Glasgow CRAG’s less polished response:
http://www.carbonrationing.org.uk/glasgow/files/a-response-to-the-draft-...

Well done folks. Let’s hope they listen to some of the points made.