angelaelizabeth |
What do people advise about how to account for electricity generated from home solar pv panels and exported to the grid? Can this be a negative in the persons CO2 footprint?
Angela
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Thread
started on 11/3/2007 22:16
What do people advise about how to account for electricity generated from home solar pv panels and exported to the grid? Can this be a negative in the persons CO2 footprint? »
login to post comments
How much to offset for electricity exportswritten on 12/3/2007 00:25
If you were being generous to yourself, use UK Fossil electricity at ~-636g/kWh [1] You should also maybe count lifecycle PV costs: +60g/kWh from all your electricity [2] So a (slightly generous-to-yourself3) figure would be -636+60 =-576g/kWh. NOTES [2] http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/postpn268.pdf [3] But electricity can be wasted if not used and can be somewhat inconvenient to grid-demand planners! This problem would be solved if we all had electric car batteries!! [4] I’ve had the same issue with potential national exports of electricity [5] CO2 Per kWh of Electricity » login to post comments
Denmarkwritten on 16/3/2007 22:33
Would be interesting to know what the Danish figure is now that it has gone over big time to wind! I went to a Royal Society of Edinburgh energy forum yesterday (in Glasgow!) where Scotland was described in Alex Salmond’s phrase as “the Saudi Arabia of Renewables”. Roll on wave power! http://www.royalsoced.org.uk/enquiries/energy/full_report.pdf PS. Check out lovely colourful figures and pie charts! » login to post comments
exported electricity from microgenerationwritten on 12/3/2007 10:11
That’s a really interesting question. My initial reaction was yes. But I think it should be zero rated. If you buy electricity through the grid from a decent green supplier e.g. good energy, it would normally be zero rated. However some CRAGS have put a penalty on it (reflecting the fact that there is unsufficient renewable energy in the UK). I appreciate that the argument is that you are displacing fossil fuel generated electricity. But commercial wind farms don’t get special payments above the market price of the renewable energy they are selling to the grid. Whether CRAGs should offer to pay individuals to promote microgeneration is another thing. Let’s look at the situation if personal carbon allowances were to be introduced. Assuming it were technically possible, you could sell electricity to your neighbours. But as this is a carbon free source, you and your neighbours would just settle up, as usual, in cash, sheckels or goats; there would be no exchange of carbon units. » login to post comments
thankyouwritten on 15/3/2007 09:17
Thats brilliantly helpful, thanks. The combination of a note of encouragement, some valuable technical info, and the exploration of the principle. The fact that an allowance is an allowance is key. Selling microgeneration is not the same as trading part of your carbon share that you are not going to use. So contraction and convergence principles would dictate that if you export you just get the price (small compared to if you live in Germany) that the national grid pays you for it, but it doisnt alter youre crag carbon accounting. Angela Raffle » login to post comments
locally generated and consumed electricity and ROCswritten on 7/7/2009 19:37
Tom in our group is getting solar water and solar PV installed in the next few months. If he could offset all his electricity consumption with locally generated units from his roof and he retired (doesn’t sell) his ROCs, he could declare to the CRAG that he’s used no electricity and build up credits that he can sell to the rest of us. However we only pay 5p per kg CO2 right now: that’s equivalent to 2.5p per kWh whereas the electricity companies pay 3p upwards for a ROC and I’m guessing that doubles in 2009. So it looks to me as if Tom’s better off not telling the CRAG about the solar PV. Thoughts anyone? » login to post comments
I am getting PV installed in Sept 2009written on 12/7/2009 18:00
It is a 1.3kwp system which is forecast to generate 1106 kwhs in a year, with my own consumption last CRAG year (Dec 2007 – Nov 2008) being 1030 kwhs. So I could be just about a net exporter, but of course largely in the summer and in the daytime so will be requiring very much other electricity to be imported. Does anybody have any links to datasets from houses that have good records on before and after installation and how much net exports are made? Anybody here know of any tips and tricks or gadgets to maximise the on site usage of electricity? I have thought about things such as small UPS style systems which will ‘collect’ at the point of usage, say a washing machine so will store enough for a wash instead of exporting it to the grid. Other elements I have thought about would be to put fridge/freezers on a timer so they only take electricity during the day (outside of peak hours). Are there any ways for electronic items to ‘understand’ that the onsite generation is producing at a time so again things like a fridge or freezer would ‘know’ when to switch on and off to utalise this. Possibly some RF gadgets to inform the appliances? » login to post comments
Govt feed in tariff amounts from segenwritten on 17/7/2009 07:31
An email recieved from Segen yesterday sets out the prices and conditions for PV and wind: “The Government has announced yesterday the details of the proposed feed-in tariff for microgeneration from systems like small wind turbines and solar photovoltaics. The new tariff will pay for all energy generated by your system, irrespective of if you use it yourself or sell it back to the grid. The amounts paid are in addition to any saving you will make by purchasing less electricity from your supplier and any income you earn from selling your surplus power to your electricty supplier. The key points of the announcement are: - 36.5p/kWh for small solar photovoltaic systems up to 4kW and 28p/kWh for systems up to 10kW. - 23.0p/kWh for small wind turbines between 1.5kW and 15kW. - Replaces the current ROC system which pays 10p/kWh. - Effective as of the 1st April 2010, but all systems commissioned from now on will qualify. - Systems installed from now until April 2010 will be eligible for both LCBP grants AND the new tariff. A typical home solar photovoltaic system of 3kW, generating approximately 2,300kWh per annum will therefore earn around £1,000 per annum, which is an additional £600, dramatically reducing payback times. An Evance Iskra R9000 small wind turbine will typically earn £2,000 – £3,000 per annum which is an additional £1,000. A Gaia 133 small wind turbine installed at a modestly windy site will earn £6,000 – £9,000 per annum which is an additional £3,000, making it a very economic proposition with likely payback times of less than 5 years on a typical site. All of Segen’s solar photovoltaic and small wind turbines installed from today onwards will qualify for the feed-in tariff and Segen is a fully accredited Microgeration Certification Scheme installer for small wind and solar photovoltaics as required by the new tariff. To find out how you may progress getting a solar photovoltaic or small wind system from Segen, please respond to this email as soon as possible, as the one thing which is certain is that demand will be high.” » login to post comments
Situation under new "Feed In Tariffs" from 1/4/10written on 26/2/2010 17:02
I think Angelas question has renewed relevance because of the new Renewable Electricity Financial Incentives being introduced from 1/4/10 and commonly known as “Feed In Tariffs” (FITs). The chances of someone in a CRAG getting solar PV installed are now much greater. The latest DEFRA / DECC Guidelines to Greenhouse Gas Conversion Factors which are the “bible” I use as carbon accountant for Sheffield CRAG [1] do not answer the question. We may get governments official answer in the next edition due later in 2010 [2]. Meanwhile … The guidelines do state that electricity imported from the grid should be rated at the 5 year rolling grid average given in Table 3c [3]. Under the new FITs scheme I suspect that electricity exported by home generators to the grid will be accurately measured and be accounted for in the grid average after an initial period during which smart metering standards are sorted out [4]. So, to calculate a home generators emissions based on “imported electricity – exported electricity” would double count the benefit of their exports [5]. I am therefore proposing to my CRAG that we simply calculate CO2 emissions from electricity on the amount of imported kiloWatt hours and ignore any exports. [1] See page 9 of 2009 Guidelines to DEFRA / DECC’s GHG conversion factors for Company Reporting version 2.0 30/9/09 [2]May appear at http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/business/reporting/ [3] See “How to use this Annex” and the answer to “How should I report the carbon emissions from my use of green tariffs” both on page 9 of the reference given in [1]. [4] DECC published the final scheme on 1/2/10 at www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/consultations/elec_financial/elec_financi… NOTE : Wind, solar PV and hydro projects of 50kW or less will have to use Microgeneration Certification Scheme (MCS) eligible products installed by MCS accredited installers to be eligible for FITs support (Executive Summary p.6). [5] The total amount of exports from home generators is likely to be very small initially but modelling done for DECC suggests that 2% of electricity could come from small scale renewable electricity generation by 2020. [ DECC Renewable Energy Strategy www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/uk_supply/energy_mix/renewable… ] » login to post comments
Home generationwritten on 29/3/2010 20:49
I agree that strictly speaking if you calculate imported electricity minus exported this over estimates the benefit of the exports a little, but as a person with solar pv I say what is wrong with that? I want to encourage as many people as possible. The vast majority of home generators do not have export meters as they are too expensive – we simply have a “total generation” meter which measures what your system generates irrespective of whether you consume it in the home or export it to the grid. The FIT will be paid based upon this “total generation” and an estimate will be made as to the proportion which is exported, so 41p/KWh will be paid for the total generation, plus an additional 3p/KWh for the proportion deemed to have been exported. This proportion has yet to be decided by DECC/DEFRA. This has 2 impacts – First it means that no-one (incuding DECC) knows how much electricity is being exported by home generators, so any effect upon the grid average will be an estimate. Second it means that as a home generator I do not know how much I am exporting and strangely it means that I no-longer know how much I am using because my “normal” electricity meter only measures what I import in the evenings etc. I have no way of knowing how much electricity I have used during the day. I have an Owl electricity monitor but that cannot seem to differentiate import from export, it simply measures what is passing through the cable. I know that in March I have generated 180 KWh so far, which is more than the 150 KWh that I used to use per month at this time of year prior to installing solar pv. As you may expect, I find the argument that my electricity use is not carbon-neutral, even though I am producing more than I am using, rather academic. I want to encourage as many people as possible to invest in home generation, so I believe more carrot is needed and less stick. After all, people who measure their carbon footprint over a period of time soon realise that home heating and transport tends to produce a lot more carbon than electricity use, so we are talking a fairly small percentage of an individuals footprint here. Thanks for listening if you got this far, » login to post comments
Feed in Tariffs and carbon countingwritten on 8/3/2010 23:09
Rick says “I am therefore proposing to my CRAG that we simply calculate CO2 emissions from electricity on the amount of imported kiloWatt hours and ignore any exports.” I think that is right, we should count imported electricity only. However I think there is still some double counting taking place. We really want to count consumed units not just imported units. On sunny days at midday, someone might be generating 1 kW, consuming 1 kW and importing 0 kW. So in CRAG terms, the locally generated and consumed electricity would be ignored yet the CRAGger would still be paid FIT based on units generated. It’s a very small point but I’m nerdy enough to mention it. On a side note, I am very keen to install solar PV but it’s complicated living in a flat. I have to get 4 other shared freeholders to agree. » login to post comments
Carbon accounting for home solar PVwritten on 30/3/2010 16:19
Thanks John, I would say that solar PV generated and consumed on site should be zero rated for carbon accounting purposes. Its zero-carbon at the point of generation. I think this would be consistent with the DEFRA / DECC approach to conversion factors which gives figures for fossil fuels based on the CO2 emitted at combustion and ignores CO2 emissions from extracting, processing and transporting those fuels. These upstream carbon costs are significant but are simply not accounted for in the conversion factors. There will be a carbon cost to producing solar panels but I would assume it can be neglected it over the lifetime of the panels ( See Post Script below ). POST SCRIPT George Monbiot quotes 2 to 4 years for carbon pay back on solar PV in Europe in his book Heat (p125 of the 2007 paperback edition). This compares with an expected operational lifetime of 25 years. » login to post comments
|
beyond zero carbon!
andy_ross
Is a (potential) CRAGger actually doing this? If so tell us more!
Andy