rss feed

Evaluation of web based personal carbon accounting packages

A detailed comparison of web-based carbon accounting sites. This is work in progress, some fields are wrong. The author (John A) declares an interest in the drupal carbon module.

See also: Web-based carbon accounting (summary)

function drupal carbon module the carbon account carbon diet act on CO2
ease of use
site navigation easy easy difficult
adding trips easy easy easy
adding meter readings difficult easy easy easy
browsing/editing earlier meter readings difficult easy easy ?
easy to analyse results yes yes yes
footprint calculation
units supported metric, miles Imperial (miles/cubic feet) and metric Imperial (Lbs) and metric metric
support for fixed number of people sharing house indirect yes yes yes
support for changing number of people sharing house no no no no
multiple car, multiple house support yes yes yes yes
aviation model used climate care own methodology based on Atmosfair custom1 DEFRA developed model methodology
ability to add/modify sources of carbon at application level yes yes using AMEE API yes yes
ability to add/modify sources of carbon at group level no no no no
results/analysis
provides tailored advice no no yes yes
comparison with national/global averages etc no yes yes yes
data import/export
storage and retrieval of carbon account data yes yes yes possible in future 2
data import support no no no no
data export support no yes yes (XML) no
external API to dynamically extract data charts only yes but not released yet
charts/tables
charts to show sector breakdown of recent carbon emission yes yes yes yes
ability to show tabulated historic emissions from any starting date up to the present day no yes yes yes
ability to show tabulated historic emissions from any starting date and any period no no no
ability to chart historic emissions from any starting date to the present day no yes yes
ability to chart historic emissions from any starting date and any period no no yes
CRAG support
friend or group support yes yes yes no
carbon emission comparison with friends or group yes yes yes no
CRAG penalty calculation yes no no no
coding
platform drupal on PHP4/5, mysql, apache Python/Django/PostgreSQL Ruby on Rails
open source yes not yet soon AMEE backend only
other
error reporting
user log no yes 3 yes no
other strengths comparison between estimate and recorded emissions 4 snazzy dynamic background graphics
other weaknesses estimates don’t account for seasonal differences 5 high CPU usage 6 and some accessibility problems 7

  1. http://www.carbondiet.org/help/calculations
  2. The web site says “In the first instance, we have concentrated on developing the user journey through the calculator and the initial calculation of your carbon footprint. Work is currently underway to allow you to re-calculate your footprint and this “returning user” functionality will be available within a month of the launch of V1 of the calculator (summer 07)
  3. Time-stamped notes can be added to the graph
  4. Registration gives a quick estimate and then entering meter data overrides this but allows the user to compare their actual emissions with the estimate. Also, the graph projects forward until the end of the month to avoid drop-off if readings aren’t entered
  5. The estimate line is plotted as a flat line where it should peak in the colder/darker winter months. Also it dips markedly in February because it’s a shorter month, and this can be misleading.
  6. flash application uses 100% CPU all the the time the web page are on display on the browser resulting in increased personal CO2 emmissions.
  7. Forces browser to fill display on startup. Text presented in tiny scrolling windows. Requires 1024 pixels width.